Page 88 - MC14326 all pages
P. 88

84 | The South African Insurance Industry Survey 2016

King IV has been revised to bring it up to date with          The oversight thereof is also separated to sharpen the       –– As first line of assurance: line functions that own and
international corporate governance codes, to align it         focus on each as a distinct area. Cyber security being          manage risk and opportunity;
to the shifts in the approach to capitalism (towards          globally recognised as the biggest potential risk, also
inclusive, sustainable capitalism with integrated reporting)  makes an appearance in King IV with oversight assigned to    –– As second line of assurance: specialist functions
and to take account of specific corporate governance          the governing body.                                             that facilitate and oversee risk and opportunity
developments in relation to, inter alia, effective boards,                                                                    arrangements, such as enterprise-wide risk and
increased compliance requirements, new governance             New perspective on risk – King IV links risk and                opportunity management and compliance;
structures , emerging risks and opportunities from new        opportunities in a way that supports the organisation
technologies e.g. cyber-crime and social media, and new       in defining its core purpose. This is an important shift     –– As third line of assurance: internal assurance providers
reporting and disclosure requirements.                        where in the past the focus was predominantly on the            that offer objective assurance such as internal audit,
                                                              negative effects of risk and the avoidance thereof. A           internal forensic examiners, fraud examiners and
Key developments in King IV                                   new lens has been provided for organisations to look at         auditors, safety and process assessors, and statutory
Remuneration governance has come under the                    the opportunities that could arise and that need to be          actuaries;
spotlight in the recent past and King IV addresses this       capitalised on to set and achieve the strategic objectives.
through requiring that both the remuneration policy                                                                        –– As fourth line of assurance: external assurance
and an implementation plan be tabled for a separate           Auditor independence and the audit committee – The              providers such as external audit, sustainability and
non-binding advisory vote of shareholders. Where the          spotlight on auditor independence globally together with        environmental auditors or regulatory inspectors,
policy or implementation plan is not approved by at           developments in auditing standards in terms of the long         external actuaries and external forensic examiners, as
least 75 percent of the shareholders, the remuneration        form audit report has pre-empted King IV into introducing       well as fraud examiners and auditors; and
committee must consult with shareholders and disclose         two new provisions for audit committees. Firstly, the
the nature and outcome of such consultation. The social       audit committee should disclose audit firm tenure as well    –– As fifth line of assurance: the governing body, and audit
and ethics committee has been tasked to oversee fair          as audit partner rotation and significant management            or other committees.
and responsible executive remuneration practices in the       changes during the course of the audit and secondly, the
context of overall employee remuneration. There is an         audit committee should disclose significant matters that     The model emphasises that assurance is not primarily
emphasis on the sustainable value created across the          the audit committee considered and how these were            about defence, rather, it is about having an adequate
economic, social and environmental context rather than        addressed.                                                   and effective control environment and strengthening the
focussing on financial targets only.                                                                                       integrity of reports for better decision-making.
                                                              Group governance – A welcomed introduction in King IV
Separation of technology and information – The Fourth         is the inclusion of recommended practices around group       The above makes it evident that companies and their
Industrial Revolution is a paradigm shift in King IV. King    governance which represents an important element for         Boards have much to consider with the eminent release
III introduced IT governance and placed the oversight         organisations operating under this structure.                of King IV. The release of King IV will ensure the continued
thereof at the door of the board. King IV separates the                                                                    evolution of governance in our business sector, while, at
two, information is recognised separately from technology     Combined assurance – King III introduced the combined        the same time, presenting a vast array of organisational
and the two are treated as such from a policy, decision-      assurance model. King IV expands the traditional “three      benefits.
making, management and culture perspective.                   lines of defence” to “five lines of assurance”
                                                              to incorporate all assurance role players:
   83   84   85   86   87   88   89   90   91   92   93